Vancouver Forum: Another swine flu thread

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

Another swine flu thread Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 12:50 PM

Ah what the heck.. lets have another.. here's an interesting interview with a doctor on CBC news - who pretty much says everything i've been saying (but i'm no doctor)


http://www.cbc.ca/ca...nt-cassels.html


Some choice quotes:

Quote

Q: But surely the H1N1 flu is severe and deadly?

A: Compared to what? The regular run-of-the-mill seasonal flu? Nope. There is substantial evidence that the mortality rate from H1N1 flu is actually much smaller than seasonal flu.


Q: Does the vaccine work?

A: It depends on your definition of work. It works in terms of helping people develop antibodies to that particular virus. But are those antibodies enough to keep you from getting sick?


Q: Is the vaccine safe?

A: Again, depends on what you mean by safe. Within the bounds in which it was studied, the H1N1 vaccine appears not to have much of a tendency to produce adverse effects.

The truth, however, is that we don't know of any rare but potentially serious effects of the vaccine campaign until we've inoculated many thousands of people.

Repeating the refrain that the vaccine is "safe and effective" is fine for reassurance but it is starting to sound strained because no one can say with 100 per cent confidence that the new flu vaccine won't cause adverse effects in some people.

2
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Group:

Posted --

Match.com - Everyone knows someone who met on Match.com. Now it’s your turn. Search Now!


View Photos of Singles - Match.com
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#2 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:42 PM

wow, rationality regarding h1n1 is hard to come by these days... good find.
also, i wonder how many people are actually getting sick by standing in those long, tight lines, probably among many infected people.
2
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#3 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:43 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 02:42 PM, said:

also, i wonder how many people are actually getting sick by standing in those long, tight lines, probably among many infected people.


This is why i avoid going to the doctor if possible...

And if i do - you wont catch me reading any of the reading material in the waiting room
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#4 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:30 PM

View Postsmelly, on 03 November 2009 - 12:50 PM, said:

Ah what the heck.. lets have another.. here's an interesting interview with a doctor on CBC news - who pretty much says everything i've been saying (but i'm no doctor)


http://www.cbc.ca/ca...nt-cassels.html


Some choice quotes:



Um smelly, Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher. He's not a doctor.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#5 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:48 PM

In contrast smelly, Dr. David Butler-Jones (<-- actually a doctor), Canada's Chief Public Health Officer who heads the Public Health Agency of Canada, recommends getting the vaccine.

Here's his bio:

Dr. Butler-Jones has taught at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and has been involved as a researcher in a broad range of public health issues. He is a Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Manitoba as well as a Clinical Professor with the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology at the University of Saskatchewan's College of Medicine.

From 1995 to 2002, Dr. Butler-Jones was Chief Medical Health Officer and Executive Director of the Population Health and Primary Health Services Branches for the Province of Saskatchewan.

Dr. Butler-Jones has served with a number of organizations including as: President of the Canadian Public Health Association; Vice President of the American Public Health Association; Chair of the Canadian Roundtable on Health and Climate Change; International Regent on the board of the American College of Preventive Medicine; Member of the Governing Council for the Canadian Population Health Initiative; Chair of the National Coalition on Enhancing Preventive Practices of Health Professionals; and Co-Chair of the Canadian Coalition for Public Health in the 21st Century.

He has worked in many parts of Canada in both Public Health and Clinical Medicine, and has consulted in a number of other countries.

I understand there is a lot of conflicting information going around out there, but check the sources people! You may think you are getting information from a doctor or a medical expert but upon inspection, that isn't the case. I am sorry, but I just don't weight the opinions of journalists, policy researchers and nameless/faceless voices on youtube with the same level of credibility as I do actual doctors and medical professionals. If you want to make a decent case for not getting vaccinated, please make the attempt to put up the opinion of someone who can at least pass the "expert" muster.


0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Google Ads
  • Group:

Posted --


  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#6 User is offline   schmoozer Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,137
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:52 PM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 04:30 PM, said:

Um smelly, Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher. He's not a doctor.


haha!!

total pwnage.

:laugh:
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#7 User is online   david o'casey Icon

  • sexy flexy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,426
  • Joined: 16-September 09

Post icon  Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:04 PM

View Postschmoozer, on 03 November 2009 - 03:52 PM, said:

haha!!

total pwnage.

:laugh:


http://gulligbulle.f..._gum_front1.jpg
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#8 User is offline   schmoozer Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,137
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:06 PM

View Postdavid o, on 03 November 2009 - 05:04 PM, said:




..so you have a few cases of that stored away huh? good for you...

?
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#9 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:18 PM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 03:30 PM, said:

Um smelly, Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher. He's not a doctor.

doesn't make him any less correct though
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#10 User is offline   schmoozer Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,137
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:24 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 05:18 PM, said:

doesn't make him any less correct though


true, however there are always a small vocal minority against all vaccinations. They say there's a link to autism, or mercury, etc etc.....

I seriously think the potential advantages of getting this shot outweigh the very remote risks.

Did you hear today that most schools in Kitimat are closed after absentee rates of up to 50% due to flu?
This doesn't sound like your "normal" seasonal flu to me anymore...
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#11 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:37 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 04:18 PM, said:

doesn't make him any less correct though


I chalk most of what non-medical professionals say up to the old addage: "Opinions are like assholes. Everyone's got one."
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#12 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:41 PM

If you read the story - he doesnt say "dont get the shot" in fact he says that statistically there's no harm either way..

There's a chance if you dont take the shot you'd get ill
There's a chance if you do take the shot you'd get ill


All he's saying is common sense stuff about not panicking about it
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#13 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:52 PM

View Postsmelly, on 03 November 2009 - 05:41 PM, said:

If you read the story - he doesnt say "dont get the shot" in fact he says that statistically there's no harm either way..

There's a chance if you dont take the shot you'd get ill
There's a chance if you do take the shot you'd get ill


All he's saying is common sense stuff about not panicking about it



See, I go to my doctor for this kind of information.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#14 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:58 PM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 05:52 PM, said:

See, I go to my doctor for this kind of information.


I wouldnt.. that'd mean sitting in a doctors waiting room with all those germs.. eww!
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#15 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:06 PM

View Postschmoozer, on 03 November 2009 - 05:24 PM, said:

true, however there are always a small vocal minority against all vaccinations. They say there's a link to autism, or mercury, etc etc.....

I seriously think the potential advantages of getting this shot outweigh the very remote risks.

Did you hear today that most schools in Kitimat are closed after absentee rates of up to 50% due to flu?
This doesn't sound like your "normal" seasonal flu to me anymore...

that doesn't mean the flu is worse tho... just that people are educated enough to not send their sick kid to school, which is generally the case.

btw, i am against vaccination, not because of autism or anything like that, but just because getting colds and flus and most other less-harmful infections is good for you (provided you are capable of recovering).
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#16 User is offline   schmoozer Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,137
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:08 PM

View Postsmelly, on 03 November 2009 - 05:58 PM, said:

I wouldnt.. that'd mean sitting in a doctors waiting room with all those germs.. eww!


mine calls me if I leave her a message...
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#17 User is offline   schmoozer Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,137
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:09 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 06:06 PM, said:

that doesn't mean the flu is worse tho... just that people are educated enough to not send their sick kid to school, which is generally the case.

btw, i am against vaccination, not because of autism or anything like that, but just because getting colds and flus and most other less-harmful infections is good for you (provided you are capable of recovering).


how about smallpox, polio etc.. have you had those?
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#18 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:20 PM

View Postschmoozer, on 03 November 2009 - 06:09 PM, said:

how about smallpox, polio etc.. have you had those?


LOL! See when you're not trying to do simple math - you're actually intelligent
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#19 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 06:23 PM

View Postschmoozer, on 03 November 2009 - 06:09 PM, said:

how about smallpox, polio etc.. have you had those?

i'm in my 30s so i was vaccinated against them, but haven't had any boosters. my daughter hasn't been vaccinated for anything tho and has laughed off every childhood disease she's encountered. i just keep her healthy. pretty sure we're going through h1n1 right now and she's just enjoying a few days off school.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#20 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 08:08 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 06:23 PM, said:

i'm in my 30s so i was vaccinated against them, but haven't had any boosters. my daughter hasn't been vaccinated for anything tho and has laughed off every childhood disease she's encountered. i just keep her healthy. pretty sure we're going through h1n1 right now and she's just enjoying a few days off school.


How many childhood diseases do you not have to worry about your child getting now due to mass vaccination?

Polio was the most dreaded childhood disease in the 20th century until the vaccine came along and it's now all but eradicated from the western hemisphere.

Smallpox is another disease pretty much eradicated from the world. Prior to vaccination, up to 30 percent of those infected died.

How about Rubella? Rubella infections during pregnancy were estimated to have caused 30,000 still births and 20,000 children to be born impaired or disabled over a 3 year span.

Not getting your child vaccinated is your prerogative but keep in mind, your kid isn't going to get a lot of these horrible diseases because mass vaccination has all but eradicated them.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#21 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:11 PM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 08:08 PM, said:

How many childhood diseases do you not have to worry about your child getting now due to mass vaccination?

Polio was the most dreaded childhood disease in the 20th century until the vaccine came along and it's now all but eradicated from the western hemisphere.

Smallpox is another disease pretty much eradicated from the world. Prior to vaccination, up to 30 percent of those infected died.

How about Rubella? Rubella infections during pregnancy were estimated to have caused 30,000 still births and 20,000 children to be born impaired or disabled over a 3 year span.

Not getting your child vaccinated is your prerogative but keep in mind, your kid isn't going to get a lot of these horrible diseases because mass vaccination has all but eradicated them.

well, when you throw around statistics, you gotta take in mind the period. i mean, nutrition, health, hygiene and medical knowledge weren't what they are now when polio and small pox were an issue in north america. in fact, according to the data of the time, you could argue that improved hygiene had more to do with mitigating polio complications than the vaccine.

also, when she was 3 she she fought off rubella (and it didn't even slow her down i might add), so now she's got better long-term protection from it than the majority of society.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#22 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 10:13 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 10:11 PM, said:

also, when she was 3 she she fought off rubella (and it didn't even slow her down i might add), so now she's got better long-term protection from it than the majority of society.


Well at least she got it young as opposed to later in life.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#23 User is offline   nelson95 Icon

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 414
  • Joined: 15-June 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:56 PM

Big money maker for MDs
Thanks to Global TV
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#24 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:59 PM

View PostDark Canuck, on 03 November 2009 - 10:11 PM, said:

well, when you throw around statistics, you gotta take in mind the period. i mean, nutrition, health, hygiene and medical knowledge weren't what they are now when polio and small pox were an issue in north america. in fact, according to the data of the time, you could argue that improved hygiene had more to do with mitigating polio complications than the vaccine.

also, when she was 3 she she fought off rubella (and it didn't even slow her down i might add), so now she's got better long-term protection from it than the majority of society.


Last case of polio in the US was 1992. I hadn't realised hygiene standards have come so far since then. Posted Image
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#25 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 12:23 AM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 11:59 PM, said:

Last case of polio in the US was 1992. I hadn't realised hygiene standards have come so far since then. Posted Image

what was the mortality rate of this 1992 OUTBREAK?
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#26 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 12:45 AM

View PostDark Canuck, on 04 November 2009 - 12:23 AM, said:

what was the mortality rate of this 1992 OUTBREAK?


Single case in the US in 1992. Last big one I believe was in the 40's and 50's. Between 1960 and 1965, when vaccination took effect, they saw a 97% drop in polio cases. By 1980-1990, it averaged 8 cases a year. Now? Nadda. Given that information, are you are sure you want to just chalk it up to good hygiene? (I am going to throw out the nutrition bit because we eat worse now than we have previously.)
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#27 User is offline   cream tea Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 136
  • Joined: 29-January 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 01:16 AM

Yes, smallpox was eradicated due to vaccine development! But there is ONLY one strand of smallpox infects humans, so you bacially need to get the smallpox vaccine once (in your lifetime). On the other hand, there are many strands of Influenza.... thats why some high rish groups are encouraged to get flu shots every year, because influenza are all different every year. IMO, you can't even compare the risk factors of all the influenza vaccines VS. one smallpox vac.

One of the problems I have with H1N1 flu vaccine is how it was rush to make it to the public and how the gov and the media pushing it on us without telling us everything. Do you know that once a new drug/vaccine goes public, it is still in the TESTING phase. Drugs are tested all along the development phase. Starting on animals, then limited trials on human volunteers, then larger markets and finally Health Canada approval for the general public. Many people think that once Health Canada has approved a new drug, then its safe! Absolutely false! The final step is to test on millions of people, this is the so called make or break step for a new drug, Many drugs do very well in smaller markets, its when the general public with all it's genetic differences, auto-immume dieases, underlying medical conditions etc, get it that its subject to the "real" test. This accounts for why some drugs are taken back off the market once they go public. Health Canada website has a place that you can report any adverse events related to the use of drugs, vaccines and other health products, because previous findings have shown that in the large population, "things" starts to happen, and it wasn't as safe as they thought. Not always..

Case in point: Have any of you heard about the 14 years old girl from the UK dies after given the cervical cancer vaccine? There are now over 2000 girls reportly "damaged" because of the vaccine.
My link
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#28 User is offline   cream tea Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 136
  • Joined: 29-January 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 01:22 AM

Another problem I have with this H1N1 vaccine is that Health Canada have granted immunity to drug companies, in case any adverse reactions occur. what is wrong with this picture!??? If the vaccine is so great and effective, why do the drug companies need legal immunity?
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#29 User is offline   razzmatazz Icon

  • Contributor
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 528
  • Joined: 09-September 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 02:41 AM

People, the H1N1 shot is no different than the regular flu shot.
1
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#30 User is offline   MJCD Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,961
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 05:10 AM

Refraining from common sense measures such as innoculations for serious diseases is not the responsible thing for a parent to do. There is no way that playing Russian Roulette with your kids can be considered a wise option, even though the it's a personal decision.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#31 User is offline   smelly Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,002
  • Joined: 10-March 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 07:23 AM

View Postrazzmatazz, on 04 November 2009 - 02:41 AM, said:

People, the H1N1 shot is no different than the regular flu shot.


erm.. yes it is.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#32 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 09:04 AM

View Postsmelly, on 04 November 2009 - 07:23 AM, said:

erm.. yes it is.


How so?

How is this one different from the H5N1 vaccine (other than the strain of course)? That one was well tested and adjuvanted as well. Please explain.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#33 User is offline   DocWatson Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,078
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 09:18 AM

View PostRealWoman, on 03 November 2009 - 03:48 PM, said:

In contrast smelly, Dr. David Butler-Jones (<-- actually a doctor), Canada's Chief Public Health Officer who heads the Public Health Agency of Canada, recommends getting the vaccine.

Here's his bio:

Dr. Butler-Jones has taught at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and has been involved as a researcher in a broad range of public health issues. He is a Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Manitoba as well as a Clinical Professor with the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology at the University of Saskatchewan's College of Medicine.

From 1995 to 2002, Dr. Butler-Jones was Chief Medical Health Officer and Executive Director of the Population Health and Primary Health Services Branches for the Province of Saskatchewan.

Dr. Butler-Jones has served with a number of organizations including as: President of the Canadian Public Health Association; Vice President of the American Public Health Association; Chair of the Canadian Roundtable on Health and Climate Change; International Regent on the board of the American College of Preventive Medicine; Member of the Governing Council for the Canadian Population Health Initiative; Chair of the National Coalition on Enhancing Preventive Practices of Health Professionals; and Co-Chair of the Canadian Coalition for Public Health in the 21st Century.

He has worked in many parts of Canada in both Public Health and Clinical Medicine, and has consulted in a number of other countries.

I understand there is a lot of conflicting information going around out there, but check the sources people! You may think you are getting information from a doctor or a medical expert but upon inspection, that isn't the case. I am sorry, but I just don't weight the opinions of journalists, policy researchers and nameless/faceless voices on youtube with the same level of credibility as I do actual doctors and medical professionals. If you want to make a decent case for not getting vaccinated, please make the attempt to put up the opinion of someone who can at least pass the "expert" muster.




since the UN's Charter/WHO circa 2005. Governments are over ruled [that includes ministers] when a level 6/pandemic is called. de facto David Butler -Jones then becomes the spokesman for WHO interests. Fascinating isn't it. Trust your government/not in this case! get with the
programme folks. A state of emergency may lead to martial law initiated by the WHO/Margaret Chan, peeps.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#34 User is offline   Dark Canuck Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 02-November 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:19 AM

View PostRealWoman, on 04 November 2009 - 12:45 AM, said:

Single case in the US in 1992. Last big one I believe was in the 40's and 50's. Between 1960 and 1965, when vaccination took effect, they saw a 97% drop in polio cases. By 1980-1990, it averaged 8 cases a year. Now? Nadda. Given that information, are you are sure you want to just chalk it up to good hygiene? (I am going to throw out the nutrition bit because we eat worse now than we have previously.)

well being that polio is transmitted from feces to mouth, YES hygiene played a HUGE roll. all you have to do is convince a population to wash its hands before preparing dinner and BAM you've nearly killed the disease. if you've done research on the subject, i'm sure you've seen the graphs indicating that polio rates in the 50s were on a downward trajectory before vaccines were developed. if you've evidence to contradict those graphs, lay it on me.

btw, i do not believe 'we' eat worse now than in the 40s-50s (with obvious exceptions). my mom grew up on one of those romantic albertan farms where they butchered an organic free-range turkey for christmas dinner and pickled their own pig feet... but she also went without fresh fruits or veggies for 5 months of the year.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#35 User is offline   RealWoman Icon

  • I wear the serious pants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,851
  • Joined: 11-November 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:22 AM

View PostDocWatson, on 04 November 2009 - 09:18 AM, said:

[/b][/color][/font]
since the UN's Charter/WHO circa 2005. Governments are over ruled [that includes ministers] when a level 6/pandemic is called. de facto David Butler -Jones then becomes the spokesman for WHO interests. Fascinating isn't it. Trust your government/not in this case! get with the
programme folks. A state of emergency may lead to martial law initiated by the WHO/Margaret Chan, peeps.


Dr. Chan. Dr. Butler-Jones. ... I am starting to see a theme here. Oh wait! I know! They are medically trained. Doc, just come up with something better than conspiracy theories from journalists and talking clocks because so far, your sources are out educated.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users