Vancouver Forum: Cloaking violates the secular nature of our courts

Jump to content

Cloaking violates the secular nature of our courts Belingerent Muslima learns the hard way Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   heinzy Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,589
  • Joined: 06-March 08

Posted 20 June 2009 - 06:42 PM

Posted Image

Not all Muslims , just the integration-resistant , belliggerent variety , never seizes an opportunity to agressively force the rest of society to accept and conform to aspects of their analphabet-friendly , so called religion'.

Coincidentally , the State wich consistently rests at the very bottom of federal employment rates , also welcomes and houses the highest concentration of Muslims in the entire U.S.A. . I am not quite sure if that is to remedy or to reenforce that depressing situation.

However that may be, there is one cleverly cloaked Muslima who feistily seeks remedial action to prevent atttempts to uncloak her in a secular court. The Judge has the audacity of hope , sorry make that audacity of demanding to see her face when she lies , sorry again , when she 'testifies'. Blinking ain't counting.

Poor Muslima, she should have picked her 'religious' fight here in Canada - we're famous to accomodate all and everyone - as long as it's not in an airport. Why , even a row of completely cloaked Muslimas resembling a row of darkbrown bowling pins , we love it - they lump it - those workaholic bottom dwellers.

There is just one thing about this disciminatory and opportune Muslim harping of religious rights .. apply it consistently ... no car driving ....no women's rights...chop the hand off when stealing .... how about getting stoned to death if four males don't confim the deed ... etc etc ...

Quote

The new statewide rule, which gives judges the authority to regulate the appearance of witnesses — such as asking them to remove face coverings, was approved by a 5-2 vote.


More
http://hosted.ap.org...EMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://blogs.wsj.com...oom-yay-or-nay/


"Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one's religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state of our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That is why the U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it....And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear."
B.H.Obuffoon
1
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Group:

Posted --

Match.com - Everyone knows someone who met on Match.com. Now it’s your turn. Search Now!


View Photos of Singles - Match.com
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#2 User is offline   Qwerty Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,496
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:27 PM

I'm all for freedom of religion. My side of the issue was, if women choose to wear a hijab or burka, then it is their right. I can no longer see it this way anymore.

Islam does not call for its women to completely cover up. The hijab is nothing more than a traditional garment that has been used by Muslims, and even Jews and Christians. Nothing wrong with tradition, but in its present form I can only see it as oppressing women.

Muslim men insist that women wear a hijab so they don't lust after them. How weak and cowardly. Don't look and lust then! Are you admitting that you can't control yourself? Perhaps these men would be better off wearing blindfolds.

I'm glad that France is at least considering banning the hijab.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#3 User is offline   cc la femme Icon

  • Don't let the cutsey smile fool ya
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member II
  • Posts: 7,410
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:29 PM

And it might happen.

France will set a noticeable standard for an increasingly morally bankrupt bumup mysogany appeasing Euro if they do it.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#4 User is offline   heinzy Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,589
  • Joined: 06-March 08

Posted 20 June 2009 - 10:50 PM

View PostQwerty, on Jun 20 2009, 08:27 PM, said:

I'm all for freedom of religion. My side of the issue was, if women choose to wear a hijab or burka, then it is their right. I can no longer see it this way anymore.

Islam does not call for its women to completely cover up. The hijab is nothing more than a traditional garment that has been used by Muslims, and even Jews and Christians. Nothing wrong with tradition, but in its present form I can only see it as oppressing women.

Muslim men insist that women wear a hijab so they don't lust after them. How weak and cowardly. Don't look and lust then! Are you admitting that you can't control yourself? Perhaps these men would be better off wearing blindfolds.

I'm glad that France is at least considering banning the hijab.


People who migrate to Canada must be aware of our separation of church and state , by entering this country you agree to acknowlege this fact and more over abie by our rules.

If I go to Iran , I am aware of their liquor , night club, dancing , etc laws , if I transgress , then everybody will tell me it's my own fault and I deserve what's coming to me.

Same principle must apply to us all , no double standards.

Yes? Ahh yes, of course - we are better, more civilised than 'they'.
Double standards are protected by law and p.c.attitude .
No wonder Muslims chuckle all the way from the bank to the temple.

I think , what France is doing now , is to ban the veil.

And by the way , there are several countries in Eurobia where total covering up , hiding one's face , is actually illegal.

Up to now ....

"France will set a noticeable standard for an increasingly morally bankrupt bumup mysogany appeasing Euro if they do it."


I think Sweden is already beyond the point of no return ... :blink:
1
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#5 User is offline   Goat Boy© Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18,281
  • Joined: 07-May 08

Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:04 PM

View Postheinzy, on Jun 20 2009, 07:42 PM, said:

There is just one thing about this disciminatory and opportune Muslim harping of religious rights .. apply it consistently ... no car driving ....no women's rights...chop the hand off when stealing .... how about getting stoned to death if four males don't confim the deed ... etc etc ...


:lol: :lol: :lol:

If only the world were so simple.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Google Ads
  • Group:

Posted --


  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply



Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users