|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Idboinker
|
Apr 3 2008, 11:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
This woman is the biggest piece of leftist crap in America.
Her whole show is based on attacking the Bush administration and it looks like she got whats coming to her for insulting Hillary Clinton. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04...linton-remarks/ So typical of the far-left, always full of anger and negative feelings, can they ever be happy about something?? Nope, they are only happy when everyone else is poor and sucking the tit of the gov't. |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 3 2008, 11:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
I will punch her in the mouth for 100.00...?
|
|
|
|
cynicalgirl
|
Apr 3 2008, 11:40 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Not big fan of Hilary Clinton, I have a feeling she will win,
We all think of Obama as the next Kennedy, though he is still pretty young and inexpenerinced. |
|
|
| Sponsor Ad | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Yabut |
Apr 3 2008, 11:59 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
This woman is the biggest piece of leftist crap in America. Her whole show is based on attacking the Bush administration and it looks like she got whats coming to her for insulting Hillary Clinton. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04...linton-remarks/ So typical of the far-left, always full of anger and negative feelings, can they ever be happy about something?? Nope, they are only happy when everyone else is poor and sucking the tit of the gov't. all from a guy that still hasn't weened himself |
|
|
| Son of the Red Earth |
Apr 4 2008, 12:17 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
I know better than to contribute to your stoopid topics. So ill sing a country jingle I made called "American".
"I am sit-ting up high<> in my Big As<>, Truck. -C-D--E---E----E--E--------E--E----F---F-----F----------------<Solo> -C-------------------------- F--------------------------------<Guit> Look-ing down on eve-ry-bo-dy else. E------E---E------E--D---D--C---D--D---------------------<Solo> C-------------------G7th---------------------------------<Guit> Th - em was-ting my time<> in their sil-ly lit-tle ca-ars. C----D---E----E----E---C---------C-C----F--F--F--F--E---D-----<Solo> C------------------------------------F----------------------------<Guit> Block-ing my way on the road<>" C------C--C----B----B--B--C--------------------------------<Solo> G7th----------------------- C----------------------------------<Guit> <> in the lyrics = rest/double sized note (in music terms). Try it out ! Attention: REGISTER / LOGIN to view the image! |
|
|
| Les Paul |
Apr 4 2008, 07:36 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 07:42 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Les Paul |
Apr 4 2008, 07:53 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Funny, because Hillary was chosen by the NWO. At least, she was, until she started losing. Conservative media already written obituary for Hillary. The message "America ready for Black president" fills headline, nobody predicts a Hillary win. Obama also raised tons of campaign fund from major corporation donors; they like him, NWO like him. He is the chosen one. |
|
|
|
Renee
|
Apr 4 2008, 08:13 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Not big fan of Hilary Clinton, I have a feeling she will win, We all think of Obama as the next Kennedy, though he is still pretty young and inexpenerinced. I guess we could do worse that Hillary. Obama has issues yet to be exposed. Read his bio, he’s about as far from JFK as you can get. He’s nothing but a leftist and a race baiter in disguise. Hopefully people will stop being lulled into a trance every time he opens his mouth and see through his well crafted façade. Instead of taking the high road and looking presidential, he’s conducting an extremely negative campaign against Hillary. Now he’s started in on McCain by taking quotes out of context and only using pieces of their entire meanings. Obama is bad news; his support mainly comes from the loony left and the likes of Howard Dean. Unfortunately it appears that the leftist nuts are in control of the Democratic Party nowadays. |
|
|
| me |
Apr 4 2008, 08:19 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
This woman is the biggest piece of leftist crap in America. Her whole show is based on attacking the Bush administration and it looks like she got whats coming to her for insulting Hillary Clinton. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04...linton-remarks/ So typical of the far-left, always full of anger and negative feelings, can they ever be happy about something?? Nope, they are only happy when everyone else is poor and sucking the tit of the gov't. i find you and your post to be very interesting. did the alarming number of right wing talk shows, ie; rush, o'reilly, hannity escape your head while making this post? did you forget about how they tackle every issue? why are they excluded from your world of ridiculing and condemnation for the way they act? carry on. |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 08:31 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Conservative media already written obituary for Hillary. The message "America ready for Black president" fills headline, nobody predicts a Hillary win. Obama also raised tons of campaign fund from major corporation donors; they like him, NWO like him. He is the chosen one. So what made them change their minds? It obviously wasn't the will of the people. Did Obama perform some voodoo ritual or something? |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 08:33 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Oh and also, how come Mitt Romney, who was chosen by the NWO, has lost? Is there going to be a big coup to get him reinstated?
|
|
|
|
Renee
|
Apr 4 2008, 08:38 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
i find you and your post to be very interesting. did the alarming number of right wing talk shows, ie; rush, o'reilly, hannity escape your head while making this post? did you forget about how they tackle every issue? why are they excluded from your world of ridiculing and condemnation for the way they act? carry on. The reason for the disparity of right wing as opposed to leftwing radio talk shows is because the right was first to take advantage of the availability of radio. It came about because at one time the mainstream television media was so disgustingly and unbearably leftwing. The conduct issue revolves around the fact that rightwing talk shows tend to be much more polished and professional than the far left nuts tend to be. Mainly because they can afford to be because they have been doing it longer and have more established audiences and ratings. Whether people want to believe it or not, most educated Americans are more in step with the views espoused by the right than they are with the far left. Most people agree with the core principles of the right and they are smaller government with less intrusion in the lives of its citizens and fiscal responsibility. Those principles are totally foreign to the far left and out of step with the majority of the American public. The only way for the right to get their message across is the use of radio, so is that a bad thing? |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 08:41 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
The reason for the disparity of right wing as opposed to leftwing radio talk shows is because the right was first to take advantage of the availability of radio. It came about because at one time the mainstream television media was so disgustingly and unbearably leftwing. The conduct issue revolves around the fact that rightwing talk shows tend to be much more polished and professional than the far left nuts tend to be. Mainly because they can afford to be because they have been doing it longer and have more established audiences and ratings. Whether people want to believe it or not, most educated Americans are more in step with the views espoused by the right than they are with the far left. Most people agree with the core principles of the right and they are smaller government with less intrusion in the lives of its citizens and fiscal responsibility. Those principles are totally foreign to the far left and out of step with the majority of the American public. The only way for the right to get their message across is the use of radio, so is that a bad thing? Too bad there isn't a party that represents the Rights position. Because the Republicans sure don't. And you missed the entire point, it's not about having talk shows or not, it's the hilarity that IDBoinker is casting stones from the Right side even though the number of craptacular, horrible, shows is on the Right. How many crackpot Lefty hosts can you name? How many crackpot Righty hosts can you name? Hmm, let me guess which number is bigger |
|
|
|
Punjabi
|
Apr 4 2008, 08:43 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Obama is the next JFK?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHA. This guy has no experience, no new ideas, nothing. He steals everything from Clinton or RFK. Lets not go into the fact that JFK was a WAR HERO. Obama is an ugly little twat who is riding a wave of idiots, I.E. - the young people of America. Contrary to popular belief young people in America are the most racist ignorant %$@#!s in the world. The sit around the whole day listening to stupid ass rap that degrades women and every other group while talking on their cellphone to their brat little friends. |
|
|
|
Renee
|
Apr 4 2008, 09:02 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Too bad there isn't a party that represents the Rights position. Because the Republicans sure don't. And you missed the entire point, it's not about having talk shows or not, it's the hilarity that IDBoinker is casting stones from the Right side even though the number of craptacular, horrible, shows is on the Right. How many crackpot Lefty hosts can you name? How many crackpot Righty hosts can you name? Hmm, let me guess which number is bigger No you missed the point entirely. It's not how many of each side is throwing stones it's the vehemence behind the thrower. Dose it matter which number is bigger on either side? The rightwing owns the radio air waves because the left owns the mainstream media and Hollywierd. And the reason the right is better known and there are more of them are because they have been at it longer and have a more devoted regular audience and that’s just the way it is. Your entire argument is moot and it has no bearing on the subject of this thread. It’s about the conduct of a particular individual and not the industry as a whole. The actual hilarity seems to be that you expect a leftist to come out and attack a leftwing radio host. Can you expect less of a rightwing advocate? Be serious will you. Attention: REGISTER / LOGIN to view the image! |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 09:22 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
No you missed the point entirely. It's not how many of each side is throwing stones it's the vehemence behind the thrower. Dose it matter which number is bigger on either side? The rightwing owns the radio air waves because the left owns the mainstream media and Hollywierd. And the reason the right is better known and there are more of them are because they have been at it longer and have a more devoted regular audience and that's just the way it is. Your entire argument is moot and it has no bearing on the subject of this thread. It's about the conduct of a particular individual and not the industry as a whole. The actual hilarity seems to be that you expect a leftist to come out and attack a leftwing radio host. Can you expect less of a rightwing advocate? [size="3"][/size] Be serious will you. Attention: REGISTER / LOGIN to view the image! What I expect is that if someone wants to be taken seriously or considers themselves an intellectual like IDBoinker does, it's kind of stupid that he would shine the light on some crackpot on the left when the light then reflects back on him and his love for his brand of crackpots. If you're going to advocate for a form of media (loudmouthed retards, regardless of affiliation), then you should probably stick with the idea that having offensive people mouth off in ignorance is not a bad thing. Otherwise you just look like a hypocrite. |
|
|
| Ted |
Apr 4 2008, 09:26 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
What I expect is that if someone wants to be taken seriously or considers themselves an intellectual like IDBoinker does, it's kind of stupid that he would shine the light on some crackpot on the left when the light then reflects back on him and his love for his brand of crackpots. If you're going to advocate for a form of media (loudmouthed retards, regardless of affiliation), then you should probably stick with the idea that having offensive people mouth off in ignorance is not a bad thing. Otherwise you just look like a hypocrite. There is a great void, for some reason, within Idboinker and negative attention is better than no attention. Children prove that all the time and sometimes children don't grow up. |
|
|
| Observor |
Apr 4 2008, 09:39 AM
Post
#19
|
|
|
The problem is that on most shows Farber dosen't get enough on air time. Farber makes all TV and radio shows more interesting and pleasing to watch. For example, I could try out for wrestling which would increase my visability but it would hardly bring me up to par with Farber. If I go out for wrestling no one will push me around. I can make the team. It is like being a model in advertising.
If I weigh 51kg I can't wrestle someone who weighs 55kg. I should be using this time for internet research. Maybe in a few years I can become a proper wrestler, I have to make the team first. Take from someone who learned the hard way laxatives are no way to go. They taste like ass. The coach said welcome back to the team. |
|
|
|
Renee
|
Apr 4 2008, 09:52 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
What I expect is that if someone wants to be taken seriously or considers themselves an intellectual like IDBoinker does, it's kind of stupid that he would shine the light on some crackpot on the left when the light then reflects back on him and his love for his brand of crackpots. If you're going to advocate for a form of media (loudmouthed retards, regardless of affiliation), then you should probably stick with the idea that having offensive people mouth off in ignorance is not a bad thing. Otherwise you just look like a hypocrite. I think what you expect is a little much. People are not always going to criticize from a neutral position. Just because someone advocates a position you don’t agree with, it doesn’t necessarily make them a “loudmouthed retard” they are entitled to their views. People mouth off in ignorance all the time and far be it for me or you to stop them. They only serve to make the rest of us look better. |
|
|
| me |
Apr 4 2008, 10:03 AM
Post
#21
|
|
|
The reason for the disparity of right wing as opposed to leftwing radio talk shows is because the right was first to take advantage of the availability of radio. It came about because at one time the mainstream television media was so disgustingly and unbearably leftwing. The conduct issue revolves around the fact that rightwing talk shows tend to be much more polished and professional than the far left nuts tend to be. Mainly because they can afford to be because they have been doing it longer and have more established audiences and ratings. Whether people want to believe it or not, most educated Americans are more in step with the views espoused by the right than they are with the far left. Most people agree with the core principles of the right and they are smaller government with less intrusion in the lives of its citizens and fiscal responsibility. Those principles are totally foreign to the far left and out of step with the majority of the American public. The only way for the right to get their message across is the use of radio, so is that a bad thing? do you actually believe what you just wrote? most educated americans are more in step with the "right"? that's inaccurate. the academic field is consistently accused of being "left leaning". take one look at who helped bring mr. bush to power. it was the power of the southern/central states. the states who are more conservative and right leaning are also the least educated states in the country. as far as getting their message out; did you forget about foxnews? all of the other tv stations are not "left leaning" but more central leaning. take one look at the pundits that a channel like CNN have on their shows and you'll even see a slight lean towards right. |
|
|
| me |
Apr 4 2008, 10:11 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
the mainstream media in the US has entered a ridiculous stage.
look at all the flack obama and his ex pastor received for the comments wright made about how america "had it coming", referencing to the 9/11 attacks. he was also called a racist for speaking against US' support for israel. while on the other hand, the media seems to forget about mccain and the endorsement he received from hagee who has made repeated offensive remarks against the jews, muslims, homosexuals and many other groups. |
|
|
|
Renee
|
Apr 4 2008, 10:41 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
do you actually believe what you just wrote? most educated americans are more in step with the "right"? that's inaccurate. the academic field is consistently accused of being "left leaning". take one look at who helped bring mr. bush to power. it was the power of the southern/central states. the states who are more conservative and right leaning are also the least educated states in the country. as far as getting their message out; did you forget about foxnews? all of the other tv stations are not "left leaning" but more central leaning. take one look at the pundits that a channel like CNN have on their shows and you'll even see a slight lean towards right. CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC are predominately leftwing run by leftist leaning owners and news directors. Broadcasting surveys consistently bear this out. Fox news is a relatively recent anomaly in American television broadcasting. Oh and by the way, Fox news is number one in the ratings as well. It’s watched overwhelmingly of both the left and right coasts by what most of us would refer to as the educated portions of the US. As far as America’s academia goes, in recent years it has always been rather leftwing and out of step with the average Americans view of things. The reason being is that most of American academic professionals lead sheltered academic lives and do not have a realistic view of the private sector. They are well paid for what they do, get their healthcare and pension benefits for free and through their unions wield enormous amounts of political power. They also have an infuriating elitist view of the general public which taints any political ideology they advocate. As far as education and Middle America is concerned, don’t be so quick to judge them based on the level of formal higher education. The voting public of Middle America is perfectly capable of understanding the issues that face the country, it is not rocket science. Those that think you need some kind of degree to understand domestic and foreign policy issues are clowns that live in their own unrealistic world of elitist delusion. |
|
|
| guest |
Apr 4 2008, 11:28 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
I think what you expect is a little much. People are not always going to criticize from a neutral position. Just because someone advocates a position you don't agree with, it doesn't necessarily make them a "loudmouthed retard" they are entitled to their views. People mouth off in ignorance all the time and far be it for me or you to stop them. They only serve to make the rest of us look better. I'm not saying that ID should switch to a politically neutral stance, or that the shows are loudmouthed because they disagree with me. I'm talking about the shows that are, undeniably, populated by loud mouthed retards. You enjoy a rational, informative right wing show? Awesome, more power to you. You start quoting Limbau and Coulter and those of their ilk, and then mock this situation? Pathetic. Hypocritical. Morally bankrupt. Etc, etc |
|
|
|
Punjabi
|
Apr 4 2008, 11:28 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
the mainstream media in the US has entered a ridiculous stage. look at all the flack obama and his ex pastor received for the comments wright made about how america "had it coming", referencing to the 9/11 attacks. he was also called a racist for speaking against US' support for israel. while on the other hand, the media seems to forget about mccain and the endorsement he received from hagee who has made repeated offensive remarks against the jews, muslims, homosexuals and many other groups. Ok Obamas %$@#!head pastor said "***** America" "United States of KKKA" "Jesus was black" "Italians are garlic noses" and a host of other stupid shit. And Obama had this guy oversee his childrens baptism and his own wedding. Hagee is just someone who endorsed McCain. He wasn't even a member of his campaign. So in conclusion you are a retard. |
|
|
| Article & News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |