real estate
#1
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:01 PM
#2
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:06 PM
#3
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:40 PM
#4
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:46 PM
#5
Posted 20 November 2008 - 04:54 PM
#6
Posted 20 November 2008 - 05:25 PM
#8
Posted 20 November 2008 - 05:39 PM
#9
Posted 20 November 2008 - 08:40 PM
#10
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:16 PM
Quote
And in two years it will be $120,000.
#11 ben
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:41 PM
#12
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:44 PM
#13 ben
Posted 20 November 2008 - 09:53 PM
#14
Posted 20 November 2008 - 10:00 PM
#16
Posted 21 November 2008 - 04:23 PM
#17
Posted 21 November 2008 - 11:47 PM
Buy NOW!!!!
Buy a shitty condo in coal harbor with no real local amenities and no privacy with 4 other condos close by looking into yours, and no view..
If you pay less than 900k for this small shitty condo - you're getting a BARGAIN!! Dont let ANYONE tell you otherwise..
Go on.. rush out and get one tomorrow..
I could do with being able to laugh at someone other than straighttalk in a year or 2.
#18
Posted 22 November 2008 - 12:11 AM
Now I know Ben will say rents will fall to but again I think he is wrong
#19
Posted 22 November 2008 - 09:13 AM
economist, on Nov 22 2008, 12:11 AM, said:
1. Who mentioned North Van?
2. Where the HELL are you getting your numbers from? How long is that mortgage for? How much for? And is it for a similar property as the one you're quoting 1500 rent for?
#20
Posted 22 November 2008 - 09:43 AM
#21 ?
Posted 22 November 2008 - 10:02 AM
economist, on Nov 22 2008, 01:11 AM, said:
Now I know Ben will say rents will fall to but again I think he is wrong
Your argument made a lot of sense when apts. where going for only $100,000 10 years ago, and it could be paid off in 10 years. But when something is 4 times that much these days, it means it'll take 4 times as long to pay it off. No wonder why people had to take 40 year mortgages, because that's the only way to afford them now. With astronomic prices like these, it's like a 100 lb. anchor around somebody's foot.
As for this potential buyer, I'm looking for something which is affordable and can be paid off in 10 years. And if that happens to buy somewhere else, so be it. I plan to be debt-free with at least $500,000 saved up. And putting $400,000 into a depreciating asset only means that I won't have anything left if it's all wasted on an overpriced piece of real estate which has no where to go down at this point and bottom out for a long long time. At least 15 more years before we see the kinds of gains we've seen in the last decade. But given the past history, Vancouver's real estate market didn't fully recover from the 1981 recession, and values didn't realize their values for 20 years. So go figger.
#22
Posted 22 November 2008 - 10:09 AM
#23
Posted 22 November 2008 - 10:26 AM
if 100k after 5 years, then a 25 year mortgage.. i'd guess its worth about 400k.. (without doing the exact math on the interest rates)
At the CURRENT prices.. a 400k appartment/home would NOT cost ANY WHERE NEAR $1500 a month rent.. more like $600 a month (if that).
If you're paying $1500 rent on a shitty condo.. then more fool you...
#24
Posted 22 November 2008 - 10:39 AM
http://vancouver.en....a...x&bedrooms=
#25
Posted 22 November 2008 - 11:08 AM
economist, on Nov 22 2008, 10:39 AM, said:
Im not denying the rent.. what i am saying though is that a place which costs 1500 a month rent would cost a lot more than $20k a year to buy...
#26
Posted 22 November 2008 - 11:30 AM
smelly, on Nov 22 2008, 11:08 AM, said:
True. So when the market logically appears will go up considerably in the short to medium time range buying is a certain winner, as rent vs own is only part of the equation.
If it logically appears that prices are heading down in the short to medium range, buying in not a good idea.
Seems all the precursors of the market for a fall in prices are in place (and have been throughout 2008). In fact, the numbers prove that a considerable fall has already started.
The simplest logic would say that buying NOW is not a great idea.
Buying when the slide levels off, and following any obvious post olympics slide, might be a great idea wherin the ownership costs become very justifyable.
It is all numbers & timing.

Sign In
Register
Help
Start a new topic
Add Reply


MultiQuote