Vancouver Forum: Tory MP close to having support to kill gun registry

Jump to content

Tory MP close to having support to kill gun registry Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   GraveDigger Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,052
  • Joined: 05-July 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 07:02 AM

Tory MP close to having support to kill gun registry

The Canadian Press

Date: Tuesday Nov. 3, 2009 6:48 PM ET

OTTAWA — A Conservative MP says she's close to having enough opposition support to kill the long-gun registry in a vote on her private member's bill Wednesday.

Candice Hoeppner says she has commitments from eight Liberal and NDP MPs to vote in favour of legislation that would end the decade-old registry and destroy existing data in the system on about seven million shotguns and rifles.

"I probably have eight (opposition) members who have indicated they'd support the bill," the Manitoba MP said Tuesday. "I would like to have 12 to really make sure it passes."

A parliamentary vote in favour of Bill C-391 on second reading Wednesday won't make it law, but will send it to the next stage of legislative approval and make it that much more difficult to derail at a later stage.

Repealing the long-gun registry would still leave registration of hand guns and restricted weapons intact, and rifle and shotgun owners would still require gun licences.

While massive cost overruns led to the long-gun registry costing taxpayers almost $1 billion through 2005, according to Auditor General Sheila Fraser, the ongoing cost of the long-gun portion of the registry system is modest -- between $2 million and $5 million annually.

That's led some critics of the registry cost overruns to question whether it makes sense, now that the budget has already been blown, to scrap the costly system.

"We might feel the same way about the construction of a new bridge that caused a huge financial scandal, but demolishing the bridge would not fix anything," Bloc Quebecois MP Serge Menard argued during earlier debate on the bill in the House of Commons.

Private members' bills are traditionally free votes in the Commons, meaning MPs don't have to toe the party line. However every Conservative MP in the minority government is expected to support killing the gun registry, and the Tories have also targeted a number or rural opposition ridings with ads and flyers in a bid to influence the local MP's vote.

MP Dominic LeBlanc, the Liberal justice critic, accused the government of "playing political games " to divide rural and urban Canada and pit region against region.

Still, he insisted that votes on private members' business should be free, even if he and Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff strongly support maintaining the registry.

"What I can tell you is the leader and I, as justice critic, have continually supported -- as do the police chiefs across the country, as do many provincial attorneys general -- the gun control registry," said LeBlanc.

"It is an important part of public safety."

NDP Leader Jack Layton also supports the registry, but said his MPs are free to vote as they see fit after consulting with their constituents.

Only Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe seemed sure that all his party's MPs would vote against repealing the gun registry.

The issue is particularly explosive in Quebec.

The long-run registry was brought in by the former Liberal government in response to the 1989 slaughter of 14 women at L'ecole Polytechnique in Montreal.

Now, with the 20th anniversary of that carnage just weeks away, the mother of one of those slain Montreal students has issued a public appeal imploring MPs to keep the gun registry going.

"I am disheartened that the Conservative party of Canada, which claims to be the party of law and order, is ignoring police, ignoring victims and ignoring the vast majority of Canadians to appease the gun lobby," Suzanne Laplante-Edward said in the statement this week.

Her daughter Anne-Marie Edward was among the Polytechnique victims.

"Last April 22 (...) Mr Ignatieff and Mr Layton (...) assured me personally that they would prevent Stephen Harper from getting his way," said the grieving mother.

Conservatives say the registry does nothing to deter criminal acts, but rather makes criminals out of otherwise law-abiding gun owners.

Hoeppner said the long-gun registry "is targeting the wrong people. "

"We need to focus on criminals and criminal activity, not law-abiding citizens."

If the registry dies, long-gun owners will still have to pay for licences, complete with background checks and safety training.


0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Group:

Posted --

Match.com - Everyone knows someone who met on Match.com. Now it’s your turn. Search Now!


View Photos of Singles - Match.com
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#2 User is offline   Pat Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,809
  • Joined: 12-December 07

Posted 04 November 2009 - 09:43 AM

Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair used the seizure of a huge haul of restricted weapons to defend the beleaguered registry. "We believe that the gun registry provides police services across this country with the information they need, first of all to help us keep communities safe, and also to keep police officers safe," he told a news conference.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#3 User is offline   GraveDigger Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,052
  • Joined: 05-July 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:10 AM

I see the prof of that in Vancouver!

FAIL!
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#4 User is offline   PRDave Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 26-October 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:17 AM

Yeah, the gun registry sure ended up being a joke.
Of course... there never was any investigation as to where that billion dollars went.
Obviously funneled somewhere else.
Just means all parties knew what was going on....
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#5 User is offline   randytheram2 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 201
  • Joined: 03-November 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:41 AM

View PostPat, on 04 November 2009 - 09:43 AM, said:

Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair used the seizure of a huge haul of restricted weapons to defend the beleaguered registry. "We believe that the gun registry provides police services across this country with the information they need, first of all to help us keep communities safe, and also to keep police officers safe," he told a news conference.



wtf they are not getting assult rifles or hi capcity handguns here in canada they get them smuggled in from the states where our registry mean shite and is a waste of money like a drug dealing gang member is going to go register his AK-47 before he goes and whacks a guy
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#0

  • Google Ads
  • Group:

Posted --


  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#6 User is offline   Goat Boy© Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18,281
  • Joined: 07-May 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 10:51 AM

Rejoice. Perhaps that money can be redirected to maybe keeping another 1/2 dozen beds in hospitals open and actually saving lives.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#7 User is offline   Renee Icon

  • Fat Bitch
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,355
  • Joined: 29-November 07

Posted 04 November 2009 - 12:46 PM

View Postrandytheram2, on 04 November 2009 - 11:41 AM, said:

wtf they are not getting assult rifles or hi capcity handguns here in canada they get them smuggled in from the states where our registry mean shite and is a waste of money like a drug dealing gang member is going to go register his AK-47 before he goes and whacks a guy


High capacity weapons and mags have been banned in the states since 1994. In other words they are just as illegal here as they are in Canada. This just more proof that gun restrictions do very little to reduce the availability of weapons to criminals and do nothing to reduce crime.
1
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#8 User is online   Sefardic-Shinto-Male Icon

  • registered user
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,356
  • Joined: 29-November 07

Posted 04 November 2009 - 12:51 PM

View PostRenee, on 04 November 2009 - 03:46 PM, said:

High capacity weapons and mags have been banned in the states since 1994. In other words they are just as illegal here as they are in Canada. This just more proof that gun restrictions do very little to reduce the availability of weapons to criminals and do nothing to reduce crime.


gun restrictions reduce crime in europe and japan and other places
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#9 User is offline   Goat Boy© Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18,281
  • Joined: 07-May 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 12:59 PM

View PostSefardic-Shinto-Male, on 04 November 2009 - 12:51 PM, said:

gun restrictions reduce crime in europe and japan and other places

Rubbish. Not having a gun culture and right to bear arms reduces crime. The crime rate in London went up after the firearms ban, but that in itself means nothing. Correlation does not imply causation.

BTW Renee, I was of the impression that the assauLt weapons ban was state enforced and thus varies by state. Else that is a law that is often broken.
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#10 User is offline   Renee Icon

  • Fat Bitch
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,355
  • Joined: 29-November 07

Posted 04 November 2009 - 01:06 PM

View PostSefardic-Shinto-Male, on 04 November 2009 - 01:51 PM, said:

gun restrictions reduce crime in europe and japan and other places



And crime rates in South American countries are huge even with bans on weapons. Crime is cultural, many Europeans and the Japanese have very different cultural views when it comes to illegal activity than Americans and Canadians do.



BTW in the UK crime against the elderly, rape, assault and home invasions have been on an upward trend in recent years despite bans on guns and knives. Inanimate objects do not affect crime as much as the gun haters would like to think. Human nature and cultural attitude drive crime rates, not pieces of steel and plastic.


1
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#11 User is offline   Goat Boy© Icon

  • Ruler of The Trolls
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18,281
  • Joined: 07-May 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 03:59 PM

Hooray!
:cheer::cheer::cheer::cheer::cheer::cheer::cheer:

Passed the first vote!

http://www.thestar.c...ry-requirements


Quote

OTTAWA –A long-running effort by the Conservatives to kill the long-gun registry has passed an important hurdle in the House of Commons, with a majority voting for the first time in 14 years to study a bill to repeal it.

MPs voted 164-137 to give "second reading" — or "approval-in-principle" - to a private member's bill sponsored by MP Candice Hoeppner (Portage-Lisgar) that calls for the repeal of legal requirements to register long-barrelled rifles and shotguns.

12 NDP members, eight Liberals, and one independent MP voted with the 143 Conservatives.

The stage was set for the vote to pass hours earlier when Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff declared the current long-gun registry faces a crisis of "legitimacy" in rural Canada and needs to be overhauled.

Ignatieff said his caucus supports the "principle of gun control," and he personally believes it should include long guns. But he said the issue has divided urban and rural Canadians, and faces "resistance" in rural Canada.

He said his caucus is working on proposals to bridge that gap. In French, he suggested it could include "decriminalizing" the registration system for long guns.

Ignatieff said any Liberal changes would start with a "simple principle: we are for a firearms registration system that includes all firearms, but there is a problem of resistance in rural areas. It could be possible to decriminalize but to maintain a firearms registration system for long guns."

It was a Liberal government that enacted changes to the Criminal Code of Canada — in the wake of the 1989 Montreal massacre — and required Canadians to register their firearms including long-barrelled hunting rifles or shotguns.

Since 2006, the federal Conservatives brought in successive "amnesties" under the law and proposed government legislation to kill the registry — which has never been brought to a vote.

Instead it supported a private member's bill knowing votes on those are "freer" than on government bills.

Ignatieff and NDP leader Jack Layton's decisions to allow free votes by their caucus ensured Hoeppner's bill won the necessary votes to pass.

"The fundamental issue is to make sure we get a system of gun control which works both for rural Canada and for urban Canada," Ignatieff said.

"We want to listen to victims groups, sports hunters, legitimate gun owners to find a way to rebuild legitimacy for the gun registry in rural Canada. That's not a thing you can do overnight."

Ignatieff downplayed the impact of a Commons vote to give "second reading" to a private member's bill to repeal the registry.

"It's not the end of the firearms registration system tonight. It's only the beginning of a parliamentary process that will be pursued in committee and in the senate."

Meanwhile, the Conservative government continues to keep the latest report on the national firearms registry under wraps, even as MPs prepare to hold the vote on its future.

RCMP Commissioner William Elliott, who serves as the Commissioner of Firearms responsible for the gun registry, submitted the 2008 report to the federal government, but Peter Van Loan, the minister of public safety, has so far declined to table the report publicly in Parliament.

Van Loan told the Commons the report would be tabled eventually but that Canadians don't need "another report" to know the long gun registry "is very efficient at harassing law-abiding outdoor enthusiasts and farmers, and wasting money while being terribly inefficient at combating crime."

The vote late Wednesday now sends the bill to a committee for more study. It could die in committee, or be amended as long as changes adhere to the spirit of the bill. But generally, a bill that passes "second reading" may not be completely re-written to contradict its original intent.

The long-gun registry's supporters and its critics see the vote as an important step towards the registry's demise.

Quebec public safety minister Jacques Dupuis added his voice to those urging the federal Conservatives to maintain the registry, sending a letter directly to Van Loan.

After a heavy lobbying effort — including a Conservative-backed radio ad campaign targeting vulnerable Opposition ridings - Hoeppner (Portage-Lisgar) was confident she would get at least eight NDP and Liberal MPs to vote to get rid of the law.

Ignatieff and Layton personally opposed the bill, but cited their respective parties' "tradition" of free votes on private members' business.

Under Hoeppner's bill, longstanding controls on restricted handguns and prohibited weapons would remain, as would requirements that gun owners hold a valid license.

Hoeppner's bill doesn't specifically say that all the current data held on long-guns should be destroyed, but the government bill that proposed repealing the registry, currently languishing on the Senate's back-burner, does. And Hoeppner agrees that's what should happen.

In its 2007 report, the RCMP — which took over administration of the firearms centre in 2006 — states that the online firearms registry is "key to the safety of both police offers and the public, providing police with immediate access to the information they require in their investigations and operations."

The registry contains 11 years worth of data on 1.8 million licensed gun owners and 7.3 million firearms, including long-barrelled guns like hunting rifles and shotguns, as well as restricted handguns and prohibited weapons.

Information published on the RCMP's website rounds up the number of firearms, saying "there are an estimated 7.4 million firearms in Canada, about 1.2 million of which are restricted firearms (mostly handguns)."

However much of the other statistical information on the website related to firearms and violent crime rates or homicide is not up-to-date, but rather pre-dates the firearm registration regulations in Canada in 1998.

The RCMP reported that 2007 saw "better turnaround times" for licences and registrations, growing number of police queries of the firearms registry, and the use of new software that streamlined "production of notices to clients, court affidavits and other official documents."

"Overall, the Canadian Firearms Program was strengthened and woven more closely into the RCMP's National Police Services during 2007. It provided better service to law enforcement organizations, better service to licensing and registration clients, and was an important contributor to the RCMP's overall goal of 'safe homes, safe communities.' The RCMP is confident that 2008 will see continued progress in the priority areas," the report says.

It's not known what overview the 2008 report gives of the system and its operations.



0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#12 User is offline   AA Lavey Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,201
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 04 November 2009 - 05:17 PM

Common sense may not be dead after all :laugh:
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#13 User is offline   The Old medic Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,372
  • Joined: 20-January 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 06:03 PM

There are national restrictions on certain types of firearms in the United States, and each State is free to adopt their own even more restrictive regulations.

No registry has ever prevented anyone from using a weapon for criminal purposes. They only restrict the law abiding from possessing weapons that they could use for hunting, target shooting, etc.

Criminals are not going to register their guns, no matter how stringent the laws are. They can purchase all the weapons they wish to, on the black market.

Long guns are rarely used in crimes anyway. I can just see some idiot trying to hide their double barreled shotgun as they stride toward a liquor store to rob it. For criminals, handguns are the preferred weapons, and they have been regulated for many years (I had to wait 7 days to purchase my first one, back in the early 1960's, because of the required police checks, etc.). But there are millions of the floating around in the illegal market, and no registry is going to eliminate them.

Belief in registeries is one of the silly things that the liberal folks like to pretend is "fighting crime".
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#14 User is offline   GraveDigger Icon

  • Advanced Contributor
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,052
  • Joined: 05-July 09

Posted 04 November 2009 - 06:25 PM

View PostGoat Boy©, on 04 November 2009 - 10:51 AM, said:

Rejoice. Perhaps that money can be redirected to maybe keeping another 1/2 dozen beds in hospitals open and actually saving lives.


Absolutely! We need somewhere to heal all the shot up gangsta bois
0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply

#15 User is offline   Pat Icon

  • Dedicated Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,809
  • Joined: 12-December 07

Posted 04 November 2009 - 06:27 PM

Yep, old medic, Canadian police chiefs are notorious for being "liberal"

Police, who normally side with the Harper government on law-and-order initiatives, have been at odds with the Conservatives over the program, maintaining it is an important crime-fighting tool that they use often.

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police asserted in a news release Wednesday that the registry has saved lives.

The chiefs say that Canadian police tap into the registry more than 10,000 times a day.

"Some of the most important queries are about domestic violence calls, which every police service in Canada receives," said association president William Blair.

"This is not a regional issue. It is not an issue between big cities and small towns. It is not about hunters and sportsmen, collectors and enthusiasts. It is not about politics.

"It is about public safety. It is about giving police the information to deal with the danger posed by a firearm in the wrong hands."

Montreal police Chief Yvan Delorme said that registry proved its value following the September 2007 shooting at Dawson College in Montreal, when police heard of threats made by another individual and they were able to check him out, learn he owned several weapons, and confiscate them.




more






View PostThe Old medic, on 04 November 2009 - 07:03 PM, said:

Belief in registeries is one of the silly things that the liberal folks like to pretend is "fighting crime".

0
  • Back to top
  • Share
  • Reply Icon Reply



Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users